<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Policy strategies for broadband: penetration vs quality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.davidellis.ca/2009/10/10/policy-strategies-for-broadband-penetration-vs-quality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.davidellis.ca/2009/10/10/policy-strategies-for-broadband-penetration-vs-quality/</link>
	<description>The role of technology and policy in transforming online culture - chronicled by David Ellis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:18:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.davidellis.ca/2009/10/10/policy-strategies-for-broadband-penetration-vs-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 18:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidellis.ca/?p=819#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Barri&#039;s question: Is the CRTC’s digital media process inclusive of broadband, or will they separate it out as the FCC has done?

The CRTC has conducted 2 separate proceedings related to the Internet. One was about content - their proceeding on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2008/n2008-11.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;new media broadcasting&lt;/a&gt;. They held another set of hearings on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2008/pt2008-19.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ISP traffic management practices&lt;/a&gt;, dubbed by some the Net Neutrality proceeding. The former was held under the Broadcasting Act and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-329.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;decision&lt;/a&gt; was issued on June 4. The ISP proceeding takes place under the Telecommunications Act, and is therefore way more long-winded. Unfortunately, the new media proceeding steered well clear of Canada’s broadband problems. 

On the other hand, the FCC isn’t simply reacting to the status quo, papering over the ever-widening cracks in the old telco business models (which the CRTC may be doing - jury’s still out). The FCC’s National Broadband Strategy, due before Congress on February 17, was mandated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (which gave birth to several &lt;a href=&quot;http://broadband.gov/recovery_act.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Recovery Act Broadband Initiatives&lt;/a&gt;). Moreover, the FCC is treating broadband as a precious national resource, just as it should. One blogger (Stacey Higginbotham on GigaOM) &lt;a href=&quot;http://gigaom.com/2009/10/09/broadband-isnt-just-the-web-its-our-future/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;recently noted&lt;/a&gt; that “the FCC is embarking not on a National Broadband Plan, but a National Communications Plan.” Same idea as the national digital strategy the CRTC called for in its new media decision. Ottawa, please take note.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barri&#8217;s question: Is the CRTC’s digital media process inclusive of broadband, or will they separate it out as the FCC has done?</p>
<p>The CRTC has conducted 2 separate proceedings related to the Internet. One was about content &#8211; their proceeding on <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2008/n2008-11.htm" rel="nofollow">new media broadcasting</a>. They held another set of hearings on <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2008/pt2008-19.htm" rel="nofollow">ISP traffic management practices</a>, dubbed by some the Net Neutrality proceeding. The former was held under the Broadcasting Act and the <a href="http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-329.htm" rel="nofollow">decision</a> was issued on June 4. The ISP proceeding takes place under the Telecommunications Act, and is therefore way more long-winded. Unfortunately, the new media proceeding steered well clear of Canada’s broadband problems. </p>
<p>On the other hand, the FCC isn’t simply reacting to the status quo, papering over the ever-widening cracks in the old telco business models (which the CRTC may be doing &#8211; jury’s still out). The FCC’s National Broadband Strategy, due before Congress on February 17, was mandated under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (which gave birth to several <a href="http://broadband.gov/recovery_act.html" rel="nofollow">Recovery Act Broadband Initiatives</a>). Moreover, the FCC is treating broadband as a precious national resource, just as it should. One blogger (Stacey Higginbotham on GigaOM) <a href="http://gigaom.com/2009/10/09/broadband-isnt-just-the-web-its-our-future/" rel="nofollow">recently noted</a> that “the FCC is embarking not on a National Broadband Plan, but a National Communications Plan.” Same idea as the national digital strategy the CRTC called for in its new media decision. Ottawa, please take note.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barri Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.davidellis.ca/2009/10/10/policy-strategies-for-broadband-penetration-vs-quality/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>Barri Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.davidellis.ca/?p=819#comment-102</guid>
		<description>...and I say you&#039;re well on the road to a book proposal to fill a vital information gap in Canada. Most of us will do a good round or two of fist-shaking @ the cable/BDU/ISP cartel, and leave it at that. One Q -- is the CRTC&#039;s digital media process inclusive of broadband, or will they separate it out as the FCC has done? One can only hope...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and I say you&#8217;re well on the road to a book proposal to fill a vital information gap in Canada. Most of us will do a good round or two of fist-shaking @ the cable/BDU/ISP cartel, and leave it at that. One Q &#8212; is the CRTC&#8217;s digital media process inclusive of broadband, or will they separate it out as the FCC has done? One can only hope&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

